Hier noch einmal:

One In Five Americans Say It’s Okay For Businesses To Refuse To Serve Jews
Nearly 20% of Americans say that it’s acceptable for business owners to refuse to serve Jews if doing so would violate their religious beliefs, according to a new survey from the Public Religion Research Institute.

The 19% who said such discrimination was acceptable is up from 2014, when 12% thought it was okay.

Support for the idea has more than doubled in the last five years among some of the largest Christian groups in America, including white evangelical Protestants (12% to 24%), white mainline Protestants (11% to 26%) and Catholics (10% to 20%).

Men (22%) were more likely to agree with the idea than women (16%), and Republicans (24%) supported it more than Democrats (17%).
https://forward.com/fast-forward/426536/...EkjP7IcIdqQGpmo

Vielleicht erheitert dich das ja genauso, wie wenn gegen Schwarze diskriminert wird.

Trump wird die Wahl wieder gewinnen.

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7251

---

Hier noch einmal:

One In Five Americans Say It’s Okay For Businesses To Refuse To Serve Jews
Nearly 20% of Americans say that it’s acceptable for business owners to refuse to serve Jews if doing so would violate their religious beliefs, according to a new survey from the Public Religion Research Institute.

The 19% who said such discrimination was acceptable is up from 2014, when 12% thought it was okay.

Support for the idea has more than doubled in the last five years among some of the largest Christian groups in America, including white evangelical Protestants (12% to 24%), white mainline Protestants (11% to 26%) and Catholics (10% to 20%).

Men (22%) were more likely to agree with the idea than women (16%), and Republicans (24%) supported it more than Democrats (17%).
https://forward.com/fast-forward/426536/...EkjP7IcIdqQGpmo

Vielleicht erheitert dich das ja genauso, wie wenn gegen Schwarze diskriminert wird.

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #7253

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7251

---

Hier noch einmal:

One In Five Americans Say It’s Okay For Businesses To Refuse To Serve Jews
Nearly 20% of Americans say that it’s acceptable for business owners to refuse to serve Jews if doing so would violate their religious beliefs, according to a new survey from the Public Religion Research Institute.

The 19% who said such discrimination was acceptable is up from 2014, when 12% thought it was okay.

Support for the idea has more than doubled in the last five years among some of the largest Christian groups in America, including white evangelical Protestants (12% to 24%), white mainline Protestants (11% to 26%) and Catholics (10% to 20%).

Men (22%) were more likely to agree with the idea than women (16%), and Republicans (24%) supported it more than Democrats (17%).
https://forward.com/fast-forward/426536/...EkjP7IcIdqQGpmo

Vielleicht erheitert dich das ja genauso, wie wenn gegen Schwarze diskriminert wird.

---

"The Supreme Court ruled last year in favor of a Christian baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding, spurring broader conversations about discrimination and religious freedom."

Kretinchen,
Lies mal, was im Urteil steht.

---

https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t...4dc&oe=5D7AC414

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7254

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #7253

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7251

---

Hier noch einmal:

One In Five Americans Say It’s Okay For Businesses To Refuse To Serve Jews
Nearly 20% of Americans say that it’s acceptable for business owners to refuse to serve Jews if doing so would violate their religious beliefs, according to a new survey from the Public Religion Research Institute.

The 19% who said such discrimination was acceptable is up from 2014, when 12% thought it was okay.

Support for the idea has more than doubled in the last five years among some of the largest Christian groups in America, including white evangelical Protestants (12% to 24%), white mainline Protestants (11% to 26%) and Catholics (10% to 20%).

Men (22%) were more likely to agree with the idea than women (16%), and Republicans (24%) supported it more than Democrats (17%).
https://forward.com/fast-forward/426536/...EkjP7IcIdqQGpmo

Vielleicht erheitert dich das ja genauso, wie wenn gegen Schwarze diskriminert wird.

---

"The Supreme Court ruled last year in favor of a Christian baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding, spurring broader conversations about discrimination and religious freedom."

Kretinchen,
Lies mal, was im Urteil steht.

---

Also ich kann zwischen einem Gerichtsurteil und einer Survey schon noch unterscheiden. Offensichtlich bist du auch dafuer schon wieder zu bescheuert.
Naja, schliesslich bist du ja auch kein GOP und trumski fan for nothing.

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #7256

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7254

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #7253

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7251

---

Hier noch einmal:

One In Five Americans Say It’s Okay For Businesses To Refuse To Serve Jews
Nearly 20% of Americans say that it’s acceptable for business owners to refuse to serve Jews if doing so would violate their religious beliefs, according to a new survey from the Public Religion Research Institute.

The 19% who said such discrimination was acceptable is up from 2014, when 12% thought it was okay.

Support for the idea has more than doubled in the last five years among some of the largest Christian groups in America, including white evangelical Protestants (12% to 24%), white mainline Protestants (11% to 26%) and Catholics (10% to 20%).

Men (22%) were more likely to agree with the idea than women (16%), and Republicans (24%) supported it more than Democrats (17%).
https://forward.com/fast-forward/426536/...EkjP7IcIdqQGpmo

Vielleicht erheitert dich das ja genauso, wie wenn gegen Schwarze diskriminert wird.

---

"The Supreme Court ruled last year in favor of a Christian baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding, spurring broader conversations about discrimination and religious freedom."

Kretinchen,
Lies mal, was im Urteil steht.

---

Also ich kann zwischen einem Gerichtsurteil und einer Survey schon noch unterscheiden. Offensichtlich bist du auch dafuer schon wieder zu bescheuert.
Naja, schliesslich bist du ja auch kein GOP und trumski fan for nothing.

---

Kretinchen,
Liest du auch deine idiotischen Links?

---

Jimmy Carter says a full investigation would show Trump lost in 2016
'He was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf,' Carter said.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/2...mp-lost-1387634

Russia’s Mueller Report: If Putin Did It, He Did It for You
Kremlin-controlled hosts say brighter days are coming for everyday Russians, now that President Trump is cleared to give them their spoils of the information war.

Russian state-TV viewers on Thursday were delivered a different conclusion from Robert Mueller’s report: Putin always wins. And now everyday Russians are going to win, too.

In the rest of the world, the Justice Department’s redacted version of the special counsel’s report concluded Moscow interfered in the 2016 presidential election “in sweeping and systematic fashion.” He identified numerous links between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, establishing that “the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/russian-st...-did-it-for-you

On display in Osaka: The new international disorder
Japan, hosting G20, tries to preserve global cooperation and fair-play in Trump-led era of revanchist nationalism and protectionism
https://www.politico.eu/article/on-displ...ional-disorder/

Putin: Donald Trump is ‘a talented person’
Russian president praises US counterpart and says UK poison case ‘is not worth five kopecks.’
https://www.politico.eu/article/putin-do...alented-person/

Und die ehemalige Chairwoman der Federal Reserve Yellen behauptet dass Trump duemmer sei als man in Worte fassen koenne. Das passt dann genau zusammen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brpaImbaGRk

Last surviving prosecutor at Nuremberg trials says Trump's family separation policy is ‘crime against humanity’
He asks: 'What could cause more great suffering than what they did in the name of immigration law?'

The last surviving member of the Nuremberg trials prosecuting team has said Donald Trump committed “a crime against humanity” with the recent family separation policy.

Ben Ferencz, 99, made the comment during a recent interview with outgoing United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...bR1m_adkD3PTGBI

Das Speed-Dating der Demokraten hat ein Ergenbis:
Trump erscheint als ein moderater Politiker.

Russian documents reveal desire to sow racial discord — and violence — in the U.S.
The revelations come as U.S. intelligence agencies have warned of probable Russian meddling in the 2020 election.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russi...zSpxe8ft1oDYdAM

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #7264

---

Das Speed-Dating der Demokraten hat ein Ergenbis:
Trump erscheint als ein moderater Politiker.

---

Kamala Harris Is Surging and Birtherism Is Back
The 2020 candidate is facing a play straight out of the racist birther playbook used against Barack Obama when he ran for president.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/kamala-har...therism-is-back

Natuerlich. Es bedient ja schliesslich diesselbe Camarilla as before. Die fahren auf sowas voll ab.

Trump Bows to Xi Jinping's Huawei Demands at G20
Selling American chips to a company branded as a security risk was only one of the areas where Trump gave ground.

The United States will resume sales of products to Huawei Technologies, the Chinese telecom equipment manufacturer, President Donald Trump said in his post-G20 press conference Saturday in Osaka.
The action appears to be a surrender to publicly issued Chinese demands....

The American president may eventually say he did not do that, but it is clear that Xi Jinping has just shown the world who’s boss by forcing his American counterpart to accede to his widely publicized demands.
It looks like Trump just surrendered to China.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/at-osaka-g...-huawei-demands

Ach ja, "The Art of the Deal" -that's what it looks like.

Trump just publicly proved he couldn’t pass a middle-school civics test
He thinks "Western liberalism" literally means liberals on the west coast.

President Donald Trump embarrassed the country yet again on the international stage this past week during the G20 summit. Speaking to reporters in Osaka, Japan where the summit was held, Trump displayed a complete lack of understanding when it comes to basic history and political terminology.

When asked by The New York Times about Russian president Vladimir Putin’s comments about Western liberalism being “obsolete,” Trump took that to mean literally liberals living on the west coast of the United States.

“He’s sees what’s going on, I guess, if you look at what’s happening in Los Angeles, where it’s so sad to look, and what’s happening in San Francisco and a couple of other cities, which are run by an extraordinary group of liberal people,” Trump told the Times.

“I don’t know what they’re thinking,” he added. “But when you look at Los Angeles, when you look at San Francisco, when you look at some of the other cities — and not a lot, not a lot — but you don’t want it to spread.” ...
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-believes...t-b9f8e2ac6fe0/

Trump Smirked as He Surrendered Western Values to Putin at the G-20 Summit in Osaka
The president and Vladimir Putin delighted in their shared belief that they have permanently eroded the liberal, democratic consensus.

Even before Vladimir Putin met with Donald Trump in Japan on Friday, the Russian president was taking a victory lap. “The liberal idea,” by which he appeared to mean democratic values, has “outlived its purpose,” Putin told the Financial Times.
And when Trump, before the meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 in Osaka, was asked if he’d tell the Russian president not to mess with next year’s election in the United States of America, Trump turned to Putin and smirked: “Don’t meddle in the election,” he said, wagging his finger a little as if he were advising Putin not to eat a piece of iffy sushi. Putin laughed. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo smiled.

The Mueller Report, which Trump and his attorney general have lied about massively—employing what the Germans used to refer to as “colossal untruth”—in fact described in irrefutable detail what it termed “sweeping and systematic” interference in the 2016 elections. And there is no doubt that Russian interference contributed to Trump’s Electoral College victory.

Last year, the scheduled G-20 bilateral between Trump and Putin was scrubbed when the Russians seized Ukrainian patrol boats and jailed the sailors on them. Trump had said there’d be no new meeting until they were released. That hasn’t happened.
Neither is there the slightest sign that Putin will withdraw from Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula, which he seized and annexed in 2014. Nor has he withdrawn support for pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine who’ve waged a war costing 13,000 lives while displacing more than a million people. Not much chance Trump would mention the 2014 downing of a Malaysian civilian airliner by a Russian missile, either.

Would Trump bring up Putin’s efforts to murder in Britain with an exotic chemical weapon a former Russian military intelligence officer who spied for the West? Outgoing British Prime Minister Theresa May is still worked up about that, at least officially. But Trump? Nah.
How about that former U.S. Marine who’s been languishing in Russia’s most fearsome prison since December on charges that stink of entrapment and chicanery? Maybe just a little mention there. What would it cost Vlad to let Paul Whelan go? And that would give Trump such a win! He loves wins. (Just look at his self-congratulation when Kim Jong Un took hostages after Trump’s election, then let them go.)

Maybe Trump thinks Putin will help him pressure Tehran to surrender to U.S. demands that it renegotiate the nuclear accord Trump pulled out of. But Iran and its proxies were and remain Putin’s allies, most importantly in Syria. And he regards his adventure in the Levantine killing fields as a great triumph, saving the regime of Bashar al-Assad. This at the cost of half a million dead and millions more displaced, including the refugees whose exodus to Europe in 2015 has divided society and made it ripe, from Putin’s point of view, for ideological conquest.

Putin’s best buddies in Europe—France’s Marine Le Pen, Italy’s Matteo Salvini, and Hungary’s Viktor Orbán—bathe in the incandescent glow of hate and fear that he and his propaganda machine do so much to promote. And of course, so does Trump. Which is why Putin praised him for his brutal efforts to stop migrants and refugees from entering the United States.

Give asylum to people with every reason to fear for their own and their families’ safety in their home countries? You know, those “huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” as it says on the Statue of Liberty? Obviously that’s one of those obsolete Western notions. “This liberal idea presupposes that nothing needs to be done. That migrants can kill, plunder, and rape with impunity because their rights as migrants have to be protected,” Putin said, echoing Trump (or is it vice versa)?

When the none-of-your-business bilateral was over, the two of them walked out together to greet other G-20 leaders assembling for a group picture. Trump had dissed several of them earlier in the summit, mainly for commercial reasons. Of course, they were leaders of democratic countries that share those Western values that both Putin and Trump, with a smirk, consider obsolete.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-smir...he-g20-in-osaka

https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/ausl...as-treffen.html

Als erster amtierender US-Präsident
Trump überschreitet Grenze zu Nordkorea

Als erster amtierender US-Präsident hat Donald Trump nordkoreanischen Boden betreten. An der innerkoreanischen Grenze vollzog er am Sonntag einen historischen Handschlag mit Nordkoreas Machthaber Kim Jong Un. Bei dem Treffen am Grenzort Panmunjom sagte Trump, er wolle Kim nun auch ins Weiße Haus nach Washington einladen.

Zitat von Maga-neu im Beitrag #7271

---

https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/ausland/internationale-politik/id_86012752/donald-trump-bei-kim-jong-un-in-nordkorea-so-verlief-das-treffen.html

Als erster amtierender US-Präsident
Trump überschreitet Grenze zu Nordkorea

Als erster amtierender US-Präsident hat Donald Trump nordkoreanischen Boden betreten. An der innerkoreanischen Grenze vollzog er am Sonntag einen historischen Handschlag mit Nordkoreas Machthaber Kim Jong Un. Bei dem Treffen am Grenzort Panmunjom sagte Trump, er wolle Kim nun auch ins Weiße Haus nach Washington einladen.

---

Mitt Romney@MittRomney
The President’s praise for MBS, the man who US intel says ordered or authorized the heinous murder of a WaPo columnist & Saudi dissident, sends the wrong message to the world.
It’s past time for Congress & the administration to impose sanctions for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.
2:46 PM - 29 Jun 2019

Manu Raju@mkraju
The administration hasn’t complied with a legal deadline set by Congress under the Magnitsky Act to determine whether MBS was responsible for Khashoggi murder.
The deadline was in February.
4:51 PM - 29 Jun 2019

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #7272

---

Zitat von Maga-neu im Beitrag #7271

---

https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/ausland/internationale-politik/id_86012752/donald-trump-bei-kim-jong-un-in-nordkorea-so-verlief-das-treffen.html

Als erster amtierender US-Präsident
Trump überschreitet Grenze zu Nordkorea

Als erster amtierender US-Präsident hat Donald Trump nordkoreanischen Boden betreten. An der innerkoreanischen Grenze vollzog er am Sonntag einen historischen Handschlag mit Nordkoreas Machthaber Kim Jong Un. Bei dem Treffen am Grenzort Panmunjom sagte Trump, er wolle Kim nun auch ins Weiße Haus nach Washington einladen.

---

Ein toller Erfolg fuer den kleinen dicken Diktator in Nordkorea.

---

Trump tries to persuade supporters that no deal on China is a win
The president is running for reelection with a major unfulfilled campaign promise — a trade deal with China.

President Donald Trump departed a gathering of world leaders Saturday without striking his long-sought trade deal with China, leaving him with a major unfulfilled campaign promise just as he revs up his reelection bid.
But the leaders of the world’s biggest economies agreed that their teams should resume negotiations that had broken down several weeks ago with Trump pushing off another round of tariffs on $300 billion on Chinese imports.
That incremental step is far from what he promised Americans when he was on the campaign trail in 2016 pledging to beat China — the so-called “enemy” that cost the U.S. jobs, spied on U.S. businesses and stole U.S. technology.

Trump will now need to try to persuade supporters — some of whom have been hurt by rising prices due to his many trade disputes — that not accepting a bad deal with China is actually a win.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/2...a-trade-1390734